Q. Some newspapers and websites have
been saying recently that Dr Soroush has officially denied that the
Koran was revealed by God and has said that it is the earthly word
of Muhammad. Is this true?
A. Maybe theyíre joking or, God forbid, they have political or
Q. So, whatís your view and your explanation?
A. God willing, theyíre well-intentioned and have simply
misunderstood things. Otherwise, anyone who is acquainted with the
divinityís dominion and with the closeness of Godís saints to God -
and knows about the experience of union - would not speak in such a
repudiatory manner. Godís saints are so close to God and they so
lose themselves in God that their word is the same as the word of
God, and their commands and prohibitions and their likes and
dislikes are the same as Godís commands and prohibitions and likes
and dislikes. The beloved Prophet of Islam was a human being and he
acknowledged and was conscious of his humanity, but this human being
had, at the same time, acquired such a divine hue and quality - and
the intermediaries (even Gabriel) had so fallen away from between
him and God - that whatever he said was both earthly and divine;
these two things were inseparable.
ďLike a stone thatís turned into a dazzling ruby / itís brimming
with the traits of the sun.Ē
God willing, if people reflect on this fine, mystical point, the
problem will be solved and the key to what is being said will be
Q. So what about Gabriel descending to bring down revelation?
A. Mystics are of the view that Gabriel isnít closer to God than
Muhammad is; in fact, it is Gabriel who complies with the Prophet.
Do we not have it in the story of the Prophetís ascension to heaven
that Gabriel was unable to accompany the Prophet and was afraid that
his wings would be singed and burn? What does this story tell us?
Didnít the late Khomeini say: ďIt was the spirituality of Godís
Prophet that brought down revelation to usÖ In other words, the Holy
Prophet brought truthful Gabriel into this world.Ē (Sahifeh-ye Nur,
Vol 20, speech dated 14 April 1987) Does this mean that it wasnít
God who sent down Gabriel? Or does it mean, in Mowlana Jalal-al-Din
Rumiís words, that ďI need no intermediary or wet nurse to give me
the kindness of God / for, Moses-like, my wet nurse and my mother
are one and the same.Ē
To say that the Koran is Muhammadís word is exactly like saying the
Koran is Muhammadís miracle. Underlining one is not a negation of
the other. Anything that happens in the world happens in accordance
with Godís knowledge, permission and will. A monotheist has no doubt
about this. Be that as it may, we say that the cherry is the fruit
of the cherry tree. Do we have to say that the cherry is the fruit
of God in order to be a monotheist? Letís not wrap the old Ashíarism
in the garb of modern sanctity. Letís speak in a righteous way and
strive to understand the meaning of delicate and subtle points. The
Koran was the product of a virtuous tree - the Prophetís persona -
which bore fruit by Godís permission, and this is identical to
revelation being sent down to us and an act of God.
My advice to the fair-minded (I donít know what to say to the
ill-intentioned) is exactly the same as Rumiís advice: They must set
aside any suspicion of Godís saints and not view them as separate
from God. They mustnít dislodge and bring down these beloved,
revered figures from Godís presence, proximity and dominion.